View Royal is trying to develop dock development guidelines for Esquimalt Harbour for the Department of National Defence. Some View Royal residents fear their unregulated and decades-old docks may be targeted by DND.

View Royal docks adrift in a sea of regulations

View Royal residents living on Esquimalt Harbour had their first glimpse at the Town’s draft position on guidelines for new private docks.

View Royal residents living on Esquimalt Harbour had their first glimpse at the Town’s draft position on guidelines for new private docks.

The harbour situation in View Royal is unique and complicated due to the CFB Esquimalt navy base.

Esquimalt Harbour is federally owned and subject to federal guidelines for development, unlike most shorelines, which are provincially regulated.

For a View Royal resident to build a new dock in Esquimalt Harbour, they have to run a gauntlet of four agencies.

View Royal is in charge of environmental development permits. The Department of National Defence has to issue a licence of occupation, essentially a lease of the ground underneath the water. Fisheries and Oceans Canada has guidelines for the protection of fish habitats. Finally, the dock builder has to apply to Transport Canada for a minor works permit.

View Royal is trying to come up with a wish list of what the Town and its residents want in terms of dock development guidelines for DND, which has the ultimate say.

Up to two public advisory committees are being set up by the Town. The goal is to bring back a new draft in about five months for the public to look at again.

Residents at the meeting in March spoke out against overly-complicated regulations and a lack of communication from the agencies involved.

Lindsay Chase, director of development services for View Royal, said people need to think in 3-D to get the whole picture. The Town controls the zoning of the surface of the water. The water between the surface and the ocean floor is regulated by DFO. DND controls the ocean floor.

“I think you guys at View Royal have got plenty to keep yourselves busy with your streets and your signs and everything else,” said one resident. “Why the hell get your feet wet in my dock area?”

The Town is venturing into regulating docks because, for the first time, DND asked the Town’s opinion on new dock applications. There is no policy on which to base that opinion.

Many attending feared that existing docks, which in some cases have been there for generations, will be targeted.

View Royal Coun. David Screech responded that what DND is asking the Town for is input on new docks. Any threat to existing docks will come from DND, not View Royal.

DND has warned that people with docks without permits of occupation will be asked to bring docks up to regulation.

“This is an attempt to find a logical, policy based position where the Town can represent our collective interests in a way that makes good sense,” said Mayor Graham Hill. “We are not striving to stir up the water at all, we’re trying to keep a lid on it and make it better.”

View Royal resident Dawn McCooey is trying to form a citizens’ association of dock owners. She owns property on the water that has a non-complying dock that has been there for 60 years.

McCooey said View Royal did not give enough notice about the public meeting or the public advisory committees.

“They kept saying, ‘Well this is just the first stage,’” McCooey said. “Well, they’ve had their open house, now they’re going to form an advisory committee. Were they going to do that without any of us?”

CFB Esquimalt spokesperson Lt. Michael McWhinnie explained in an email that since assuming responsibility for the harbour in 2005, DND has been working toward bringing the harbour up to regulation.

DND expects homeowners to voluntarily comply with existing regulations and any issues “will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis,” he wrote.

“CFB Esquimalt leadership is committed to reaching a state of regularization through a reasoned and collaborative approach that includes stakeholder input from the Town of View Royal as well as local property owners,” McWhinnie wrote.

Any regulation enforcement is a process of applying existing policy “rather than an ‘update’ or any other term that implies change.”

news@goldstreamgazette.com

 

 

Just Posted

Monday sees rain with high of 10 C

Plus your weekly forecast

Number of ancient humans continues to grow after discovery

Scientists identify at least 12 species outside of Homo sapians following discovery in Philippines

Peninsula grandmothers salute Roaring ’20s fashion

May 3 event in Sidney benefits Grandmothers Helping African Grandmothers

Deep Cove man running 50 km every month through his 50th birthday year

Ultrarunner hopes Deep 50 Challenge will raise $5,000 for Help Fill A Dream

Sri Lanka invokes war-time military powers after nearly 300 killed in Easter bombings

Sri Lanka’s minister of tourism says 39 foreign tourists were killed in the Easter Sunday attacks

POLL: How often does your family use BC Ferries?

Navigating the lineups for BC Ferries is a way of life for… Continue reading

Crime Stoppers most wanted for Greater Victoria for the week of April 16

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers is seeking the public’s help in locating the… Continue reading

Bodies of 3 mountain climbers recovered after last week’s Banff avalanche

The men disappeared while attempting to climb the east face of Howse Peak in the Icefields Parkway

Happy birthday: Queen Elizabeth II turns 93 on Easter Sunday

Sunday is the first of two birthday celebrations each year for the queen

RCMP confirm witnesses say body found at Kelowna’s Gyro Beach

Police tape is blocking part of the beach and several RCMP officers are on scene.

B.C. fire department rescues kittens

Enderby homeowner not aware kittens in wood pile near garbage pile fire that got out of hand

QUIZ: How much do you know about Easter?

Take this short quiz and put your knowledge to the test

Most Read