Amalgamation ad misleading about View Royal

View Royal supporters may have been given false hope

A quarter-page ad that ran Tuesday in a Victoria newspaper got some of the facts wrong when it declared the Town of View Royal’s intentions for a council meeting that night.

The ad, purchased by the Capital Region Municipal Amalgamation Society, stated “the mayor and council of View Royal will be discussing the Amalgamation Yes request to include a non-binding referendum question to study amalgamation” at the Sept. 16 council meeting. It urged View Royal residents to attend and express their support of adding the question to November’s municipal ballot.

However, when asked about the possible discussion, Coun. David Screech said the matter had already been closed.

“We were just as surprised (at the ad),” he said. “It’s not on our agenda. It was already discussed at council and we decided we would stick with ‘no.’”

Jennifer Cochrane, executive assistant for the Town of View Royal, confirmed late Tuesday that further discussion on the referendum question had not been added to the agenda.

John Vickers, vice-president for the society, said the wording in the ad resulted from a misunderstanding.

“It was our understanding that all motions from a committee of the whole (meeting) had to be put forward in the minutes and come before council to be approved,” he said.

The hiccup came because the decision had already been made in July at a previous committee of the whole meeting, said Screech, and the mention of the question in the Sept. 9 meeting arose from previous business.

The initial ‘no’ decision in July came about because council thought it was “absurd” to have only Victoria and View Royal putting the question on the ballot, said Screech. With Langford and Central Saanich saying yes to a ballot question in the intervening time between July’s meeting and Sept. 9, Coun. Ron Mattson suggested they revisit the decision in light of the new information.

While not necessarily in favour of amalgamation, Mattson said “it’s essential that we give the public the opportunity to provide their views on amalgamation.”

The motion to revisit the ‘no’ vote from July was defeated 3-2, and so the matter was closed, said Screech.

Nonetheless, members of Amalgamation Yes showed up at the council meeting and took advantage of the public question and answer period to bring up the matter of the question again.

“They just received the reply that the decision had been made to not include the question,” Screech said.

acowan@goldstreamgazette.com

Just Posted

Flat tire, kindness of strangers, surprisingly inflate hope

Sooke mom and her daughters knocked on door of Bob and Norma Saunders seeking help

Health Canada suspends Island pot producer’s licence following unannounced visit

Evergreen Medicinal Supply is working on “corrective action”

Victoria student out $600 for lack of e-bike insurance blames confusing rules

B.C. regulation says e-bike motors must turn off if rider stops pedalling, or bike must be insured

Oak Bay grants 60 days of protection for century-old mansion

J.W. Morris House slated for removal by Abstract Developments

Saanich police ask for public’s help locating missing high risk youth

The 12-year-old was last seen before school on Monday morning

Sealand was much more than killer whales, says ex-employee

Former Sealasd trainer revisits Sealand of the Pacific in talk

Crime Stoppers most wanted for Greater Victoria for the week of September 17

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers is seeking the public’s help in locating the… Continue reading

POLL: Should the province step in to upgrade the road to Bamfield?

The death of two University of Victoria students on a bus bound… Continue reading

35 of 87 dogs in 2018 Williams Lake seizure were euthanized due to behavioural issues, BCSPCA confirm

The dogs did not respond to the behaviour modification and remained terrified of humans

B.C. ‘tent city’ disputes spark call for local government autonomy

UBCM backs Maple Ridge after province overrules city

B.C. drug dealers arrested after traffic stop near Banff turns into helicopter pursuit

Antonio Nolasco-Padia, 23, and Dina Anthony, 55, both well-known to Chilliwack law enforcement

B.C. MLA calls on province to restrict vaping as first related illness appears in Canada

Todd Stone, Liberal MLA for Kamloops-South Thompson, introduced an anti-vaping bill in April

Most Read