Colwood council retroactively approved the retaining wall on the left despite it being built both higher than the City’s bylaws allow and without a permit. A public staircase lies to the right of the wall. (Joel Tansey/News Gazette photo)

The wall can stay, Colwood council says

Council approves retaining wall that was built without a permit

Colwood council approved a development variance for a retaining wall despite it being built higher than the City’s bylaws allow and without a permit.

An application for a single-lot development on Pelican Drive was submitted on Aug. 17 of last year, after the City introduced new regulations for retaining walls. The amended bylaws call for a limit of 1.2 metres in height unless terraced. In the latter case, the height of each section cannot exceed 1.2 metres and the structure must be as wide as it is tall.

The Pelican Drive application included drawings of the proposal which didn’t show a retaining wall, but a wall in excess of four metres was built anyways, prompting the property’s owner to request a retroactive development variance.

Council granted the variance, going against a recommendation from staff, on the condition that aesthetic, landscaping and engineering improvements be made.

A staff report outlined a number of concerns, including the wall’s potential impact on underground utilities or services on the adjacent City-owned right-of-way, the lack of a formal landscaping plan to improve aesthetics, and the fact that the wall doesn’t fall within Colwood’s Official Community Plan.

In a letter to the City, Dylan Quigley outlined that he needed the wall, which borders a public pathway, in order to facilitate a parking spot for a suite and to accommodate access for his electrical and gas services.

“I have realised that I have violated your laws regarding retaining walls and am looking to make things as nice as possible to comply and also because this is the home I plan on raising my family in,” he wrote, also detailing that he will plant cedar hedges along the wall and honeysuckle or ivy plants to climb it.

The proposal didn’t sit well with Coun. Cynthia Day, who, along with Coun. Jason Naultone, voted against the variance.

“It encroaches right to the lot line so there’s not really enough room to put cladding on the wall without it further encroaching into the right of way. And it was built knowingly and without any inspections or permits,” she told the Gazette.

Day also expressed concern over the aesthetics of the wall given its position next to the public path, and the precedent the decision may set for future developments.

“I’m concerned that it weakens our position with future proposals coming forward,” she noted.

Coun. Gordie Logan voted in favour of the variance, although he admitted it was a difficult decision and that the planning and land use committee and council were put in a tough position as a result of the owner’s error.

“From my perspective, we were looking for a bit of a middle ground and looking for a solution that both parties could live with. The City identified a few items that needed to be addressed, that being the aesthetics, the landscaping and the engineering of the wall,” he said.

Logan added that a couple of members of committee agreed that if the correct process had been followed by the applicant, the wall would have likely been approved.

“With that lens, we wanted to look for solutions as opposed to coming down with a heavy hand and see if we could make it work for both parties,” he said.

He added that any future variance requests would have to continue to be looked at on a case-by-case basis.

“I think we would need to evaluate the circumstance and ask ourselves if it impacts anybody. Does it have any effect on City rights-of-ways? Is it going to put some liability onto the City and the taxpayer? I think we evaluate each decision as it comes up.”

joel.tansey@goldstreamgazette.com

Twitter: @joelgazette

Just Posted

Arguments ramp up against proposed Sooke daycare

Proposed Church Road facility clears the latest hurdle

UVic announces review into circumstances of fatal bus crash

Upcoming student trip on the same route not cancelled

Hundreds gather at fundraising kickoff for ‘Kings Park’ purchase

Campaign to raise $2.75 million for the District of Saanich underway

Saanich police injured while arresting suspect

Man accused of shoplifting pulls out a knife, struggles with arresting officers

Royal Air Force Aerobatic Team to soar to soar over Victoria’s Inner Harbour

Red Arrows fly past Sept. 26 over the parliament and Inner Harbour

Third instance of Trudeau in skin-darkening makeup emerges

Another instance of Trudeau using makeup to darken his face has emerged, within 24 hours of the first

Crime Stoppers most wanted for Greater Victoria for the week of September 17

Greater Victoria Crime Stoppers is seeking the public’s help in locating the… Continue reading

POLL: Should the province step in to upgrade the road to Bamfield?

The death of two University of Victoria students on a bus bound… Continue reading

Yearbook photo surfaces of Trudeau wearing ‘brownface’ costume in 2001

The report describes the occasion as an ‘Arabian Nights’-themed gala event

‘Troubling, insulting’: NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh reacts to Trudeau’s brownface photo

Jagmeet Singh, leader of the New Democrats, responded with a call for love after Trudeau photos surface

Elderly B.C. man gets 10 years in prison for sexually abusing young daughters

WARNING: This story contains graphic details and is not appropriate for all readers

‘This is not a drill’: Whistler Blackcomb gets first snowfall of the season

The 7th Heaven Summit had a dusting of snow Tuesday morning

Legislature gifts, clothing, travel need better control, B.C. auditor says

Audit follows suspensions of managers by Speaker Darryl Plecas

Most Read