News

West Shore Parks and Recreation Society looks into switching to majority-rules model

Colwood resident Scott Lehr works out at the Juan de Fuca Recreation Centre.  The governance model for the West Shore Parks and Recreation Society, which manages the centre, is in question after a report was released suggesting a switch to majority rules.  - Kyle Wells/News staff
Colwood resident Scott Lehr works out at the Juan de Fuca Recreation Centre. The governance model for the West Shore Parks and Recreation Society, which manages the centre, is in question after a report was released suggesting a switch to majority rules.
— image credit: Kyle Wells/News staff

Questions over the governance model for the West Shore Parks and Recreation Society are bringing up some old tensions and concerns from member municipalities.

On June 13, a report requested from barrister and solicitor Christopher Nation was presented to the society’s board of directors. In the report, Nation recommends decisions related to budget and capital expenditures be changed from a unanimous vote to majority rules, weighted toward the financial input of voting members.

The concern has been that smaller municipalities contribute a minority of the funding but can veto projects from going ahead.

The recent expansion of the weight room and fitness studio, for instance, only went ahead because of an unwritten side deal with Metchosin and Highlands. If the weight room were to lose money, those two municipalities would be exempted from helping cover the loss.

Colwood Mayor Carol Hamilton agrees with the report’s recommendations and thinks the agreement needs to be changed to majority rules.

She is in the process of arranging a meeting between co-owners of West Shore Park and Recreation, represented by mayors and the Capitol Regional District representative.

“I think we have a really unique situation here and for the most part it’s always worked well,” Hamilton said. “Let’s work on what’s not-working and fix it, as opposed to tossing things out.”

Metchosin Mayor John Ranns disagrees with where attention is being focused. He described the governance debate as a “smokescreen” that prevents the board and owners from tackling the real issues. As the veto has hardly been used, he doesn’t see what the concern is.

“The main issue is not governance,” Ranns said. “There’s some pretty serious concerns there: Bear Mountain arena losing half a million a year, continued requisition increases almost more than double inflation rates, stuff like that. Those are the things we need to address.”

For his part, Langford mayor Stew Young said a meeting of the mayors would be a waste of time. The governance model needs to be changed to a majority vote, Young said, adding the unanimous vote system has prevented any real development from taking place at the site.

“If the governance is dysfunctional it’s damaging to the residents,” Young said. “The governance model has to change or probably you’ll see some drastic changes down there at Juan de Fuca. ... It never should have been put unanimous, that’s not democracy.”

news@goldstreamgazette.com

 

 

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Farrah Fawcett dies age 62
 
MLAs shake fingers in quake exercise
 
Police await autopsy results of suspicious death investigation
Life on the other side of the fence
 
Lessons learned in fender bender
 
Tour de Rock community party a hairy affair in Port Alberni
New BC NDP leader Horgan pitches resource development
 
Valley people: Dave Howard
 
The Week — Dec. 22

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 17 edition online now. Browse the archives.